It's over!

A belated thank you to all our participants! Not all drives were claimed, but sources say that Jennifer Borland managed to come into possession of the drive Morey had stolen, correctly deducing the password! It turned out that Morey wasn't the culprit -- it was the mild-mannered Melanie D'Anogaster all along! But Jennifer did the best she could with the clues that were given, beating out the competition and enjoying the sweet satisfaction of success. Word has it that a $20 certificate to the Game Preserve awaits her.

Highlight reel:

• Triumph of the Jenns: Jenn Stevens scored a nice solve on Irene's initial clue, but Jennifer Borland started racking up the solves once the going got tough;
• Will Emigh taught Ariadne to uncross her eyes to solve a tricky Photoshop clue of d'Anogaster's;
• A real-life Lojban speaker started tweeting to Jennifer Borland and Prof. Belbo in Lojban after she tweeted the response to Prof. Belbo's first clue;
• Field report from our representative in Wilkie: "Some guy came in, said 'is that the clue?!' I said 'yes' then he grabbed it and ducked out the door before I could ask his name... Brown jacket, jeans, baseball cap, 30-ish." His identity is still a mystery.
• The manuscript was retrieved -- Causaubon couldn't stop chuckling upon reading Chapter 1. Stay tuned!

Finally, don't forget about all the excitement going on this month with the Games and Learning Event Series, and a hearty thank you to all our participants!

A little disappointed but ready for the next one…

I’m not sure what I expected when I approached Intellagirl with the idea of running an ARG and trying to recruit faculty to play it. In my wildest dreams I imagined hordes of faculty members running around campus, furiously tweeting, collaborating, and one-upping each other, but those were pretty wild dreams. I hoped for a few faculty members playing and lots of them lurking and following the action to see what this thing was like. A few people promised me they would lurk, and of course I don’t know for sure if they did. It’s a pretty unfamiliar genre for this particular demographic.

This all started when I realized that, with James Gee’s visit on March 23^rd, we had a great opportunity to give this kind of learning experience some exposure. Like a good hostess, I’m reading the 2^nd edition of his book What Video Games Have to Teach Us about Learning and Literacy (because I get to drive him to the airport). One of the things that has struck me from his narrative about his experiences playing games has been his claim that baby-boomers (and I’m one of ‘em) are often impatient about the non-linearity of games. We want to figure out the quickest way to get to our goal; we don’t want to wander around wondering what items we should be picking up. Maybe we are the epitome of wanting to know what’s going to be on the test and studying that. And we’re likely to at least start playing a game by ourselves instead of in a community. None of that thinking is really very useful in an ARG. When you start, you rarely know exactly what you are after or how you are going to get it, so why even get embroiled in the whole thing (to say nothing of the fact that you might “fail”)? Then you have to follow several threads – blogs, twitter accounts – and that’s just kind of annoying. I will have to admit that if I wasn’t involved, I might have decided I was just too busy to mess with the whole thing.

In retrospect we might have gotten off to a faster start if we had called it something besides an Alternate Reality Game, a title that gets a lot of blank stares. Intellagirl thought we might have gotten more traction if we called it a game that is played via social media or something. Maybe. I just think everyone needs more exposure; they need to get used to the idea. Maybe we’ll call it something else next time, but there will be a next time…

Feeling Schizophrenic

Just a short post here to point out one of the fun difficulties of running this game. Because I'm a hardcore Gmail user (ie I never close it), I have to use a separate browser to log in to Ariadne's accounts and to prevent accidentally posting as myself rather than as her. But today Maggie is away so I'm posting for her as well thus I have a third browser open to ensure that I don't "cross the streams" with poor Morey Arte. Having Chrome, Firefox, and Explorer open and logged in to accounts at the same time is a bit crazy but you do what you have to.
Ah, the joys of technology, story telling, and being just a little bit crazy! Now stop reading this and go play!

The best laid plans (Part I)

I had originally intended to examine the biggest challenge that the team faced when designing the ARG. Unfortunately, there wasn't just ONE; the challenges faced were quite related to one another and almost inseparable. Not only did the team have to design the puzzles, we had to balance the difficulty, generate interest, as well as managing the created personas and interactions with participants and characters. As a matter of fact, that sounded like one too many! For today, I'll focus on one of the challenges; puzzle creation and balance.

Puzzle creation and balancing difficulty
One of the many challenges in designing the ARG was puzzle creation. It was relatively difficult trying to gauge the level of difficulty of these puzzles. It was important to draw players in, which meant that puzzles could not start off insanely hard. At the same time, we had to provide SOME sort of a challenge so as to keep our audience intrigued. In short, we had to make sure to ensure flow for our players. We tested out the puzzles on each other; some were fun and some were just mind-boggling. This mix seemed sufficient and the team started off with puzzles that could be feasibly solved within 1-2 days. In the course of the ARG, there were moments when players' ingenuity worried us, but the beauty of working in a team is that there were always other puzzles that were trickier.

In terms of Irene Peabody's clues, I struggled and worried my nails about whether the second clue could be potentially annoying. The initial idea was to use the first edition of the book and to use the copy available in the IU Lilly library. This would be a great way to get students and faculty to use the library and be more aware of the resources we have on campus. However, this meant that non-IU players might not have access, which reduces our pool of players. Then, there came the issue of specificity. How could I ensure that it was the correct book? I will forever be indebted to Gordon Foster. Using the ISBN number, this became less of an issue. You would have thought that this was an easy solution; but in reality, the obvious answer came very much later. Sometimes, the obvious solution is not as apparent!

What are the kinds of challenges do you think ARG developers run into? What are the ways that we can preemptively handle them or this is just a fantasy?

Part II: Story and Structure

What I like most about ARGs is the way that the story line compels the play and provides a reason to keep playing. Most ARGs aren't competitive. Instead, players are working together to move the story along to reveal the ending. We humans like stories. We like to ask "and then what happened?" A good story keeps us asking what's next.
However, not every story will work for an ARG or every audience. Understanding the constraints you have (your audience, geography, technology, time etc) will actually help, rather than hinder, the creation of a story.  We knew that our audience would be primarily educators or people related to education so we evolved a plot that we hope they will relate to and be interested in. We wanted the gameplay to make sense with the story and for players to easily understand why they should want to solve them and why they're being presented.
When I talk to people about designing ARGs I often hear that they're intimidated by the story. "I'm not a writer." "I'm not creative." "How can you make a story about -insert discipline here-?" But you shouldn't be scared off by the challenge of creating a plot to tie your game together. It isn't strictly necessary for a good game (ie fun!) to have some kind of fictional line woven through it. Some simple game mechanics can take its place. Perhaps a point system, a scavenger hunt, a race...there are lots of common structures that we've all experienced that can work.
Because we knew most of our audience would be novice game players, we wanted a structure behind the scenes that would be familiar but still challenging. We brainstormed about the possibilities and considered many different familiar games: crossword puzzles, popular board games etc and settled on a logic puzzle. You know, those puzzles in magazines that ask you to figure out which of five people live in which of five houses which are each a different color and have a different car in the driveway. These have been around for a long time and most people have at least tried one at some point. Making this decision allowed us to jump right to the kinds of clues we could create, how they should be released, and what the finale of the game should be (shhhh! That's still a secret!)
What game structures would you try? What games do you love that you think could be used for inspiration? What stories will your audience enjoy and engage with?